EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

Chasing Ernst L Wynder: 40 years of Philip Morris’ efforts to influence a leading scientist

N Fields and S Chapman

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Nicole Fields, School of Public Health, Room 129A, Edward Ford Building (A27), University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
fieldsn{at}health.usyd.edu.au

Study objective: To highlight strategies used by the Philip Morris tobacco company to try to manipulate the eminent scientist, Dr Ernst Wynder between 1955 and 1995.

Methods: Systematic keyword and opportunistic searching of www.pmdocs.com for formerly internal tobacco industry documents concerning Philip Morris executives and Wynder. Available materials included reports, budget reviews, and correspondence.

Main results: The emergence of smoking as a priority issue on the American public health agenda can be largely attributed to Wynder’s research and publicity efforts. Philip Morris viewed Wynder as a prestigious scientist whose commitment to the pursuit of reduced harm cigarettes could lend legitimacy to its desire to position itself as a responsible company intent on addressing consumer concerns. Philip Morris courted Wynder with large equipment loans and grants for more than 30 years, and used its public relations agency to sanitise press releases to remove material unacceptable to the company. Wynder consistently failed to acknowledge industry support while routinely acknowledging other funding from the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society. In retrospect, Wynder realised the insidious effect of tobacco industry research support but failed to acknowledge this may have applied to his own association with the industry.

Conclusions: Industry documents reveal a deliberate attempt by Philip Morris to pursue and manipulate Dr Wynder to legitimise their company positions.

Keywords: research support; tobacco industry; conflict of interest; smoking

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

MENTAL HEALTH, UNEMPLOYMENT, TOBACCO, WASTE, AND PIGS

John R Ashton and Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
J Epidemiol Community Health 2003 57: 545. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Claxton, L. (2007). A review of conflict of interest, competing interest, and bias for toxicologists. Toxicol Ind Health 23: 557-571 [Abstract]  
• Schick, S. F, Glantz, S. A (2007). Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement. Tobacco Control 16: 157-164 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Francis, J. A, Shea, A. K, Samet, J. M (2006). Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses. Tobacco Control 15: iv68-iv76 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bornhauser, A, McCarthy, J, Glantz, S A (2006). German tobacco industry's successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke.. Tobacco Control 15: e1-e1 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gruning, T., Gilmore, A. B., McKee, M. (2006). Tobacco Industry Influence on Science and Scientists in Germany. Am. J. Public Health 96: 20-32 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tong, S, Olsen, J (2005). The threat to scientific integrity in environmental and occupational medicine. Occup. Environ. Med. 62: 843-846 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chapman, S (2005). Research from tobacco industry affiliated authors: need for particular vigilance. Tobacco Control 14: 217-219 [Full Text]  
• Glantz, S. A. (2005). Tobacco Money at the University of California. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 171: 1067-1069 [Full Text]  
• Bero, L A, Glantz, S, Hong, M-K (2005). The limits of competing interest disclosures. Tobacco Control 14: 118-126 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Glantz, S. A (2004). Effect of public smoking ban in Helena, Montana: Author's reply. BMJ 328: 1380-1380 [Full Text]  
• Malone, R E, Bero, L A (2003). Chasing the dollar: why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 546-548 [Full Text]  
• Parascandola, M (2003). Hazardous effects of tobacco industry funding. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 548-549 [Full Text]