© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group
THEORY AND METHODS
Performance of the WHO Rose angina questionnaire in post-menopausal women: Are all of the questions necessary?
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D A Lawlor, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK;
d.a.lawlor{at}bristol.ac.uk
Objective: To assess the performance of a shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire focusing on exertional chest pain.
Methods: Cross sectional analysis of 3987 women aged 60 to 79 years from 23 British towns. The performances of definite Rose angina (using data from the full Rose angina questionnaire) and exertional chest pain (using data from a subset of three questions from the Rose angina questionnaire) were assessed against a medical record of angina.
Results: The sensitivity (the proportion with a medical record of angina who were identified as having angina by the questionnaire) was 29.9% (95% confidence intervals 25.7% to 34.4%) comparing definite Rose angina to any medical record of angina since 1978 and 50.7% (45.9% to 55.5%) comparing exertional chest pain to any medical record diagnosis of angina. The positive predictive values of both questionnaires were similar. When the two questionnaires were compared with a gold standard of a primary care consultation for angina symptoms within the past five years the sensitivity of definite Rose angina was 33.0% (26.9% to 39.6%) and that of exertional chest pain was 51.8% (45.1% to 58.5%). Although the sensitivity of both versions of the questionnaire was greater in those aged 6069 years compared with those aged 7079 years, it remained higher in the exertional chest pain version of the questionnaire than for definite Rose angina based on the full version of the questionnaire in both age groups. Performance of either version of the questionnaire was not affected by occupational social class.
Conclusions: With respect to identifying women with a medical diagnosis of angina or those presenting to primary care with anginal symptoms, these results suggest that a shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire focusing on exertional chest pain performs better than the full version. Other studies suggest that exertional chest pain is the crucial element of the Rose angina questionnaire with respect to predicting future coronary events. It is concluded that using a shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire is adequate in epidemiological studies.
Keywords: angina; Rose angina questionnaire; sensitivity
Relevant Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
J Epidemiol Community Health 2003 57: 473.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Choi, E.-K., Choi, S. I., Rivera, J. J., Nasir, K., Chang, S.-A., Chun, E. J., Kim, H.-K., Choi, D.-J., Blumenthal, R. S., Chang, H.-J.
(2008). Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography as a Screening Tool for the Detection of Occult Coronary Artery Disease in Asymptomatic Individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol
52: 357-365
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Graff-Iversen, S, Selmer, R, Lochen, M-L
(2008). Rose angina predicts 23-year coronary heart disease mortality in women and men aged 40-49 years. Heart
94: 482-486
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Ugurlu, S., Seyahi, E., Yazici, H.
(2008). Prevalence of angina, myocardial infarction and intermittent claudication assessed by Rose Questionnaire among patients with Behcet's syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford)
47: 472-475
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Timmis, A. D, Feder, G., Hemingway, H.
(2007). Prognosis of stable angina pectoris: why we need larger population studies with higher endpoint resolution. Heart
93: 786-791
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Murphy, N F, Stewart, S, Hart, C L, MacIntyre, K, Hole, D, McMurray, J J V
(2006). A population study of the long-term consequences of Rose angina: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew-Paisley study. Heart
92: 1739-1746
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
