PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s

D Baker and E Middleton

National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor D Baker, Institute of Public Health Research and Policy, University of Salford, Humphrey Booth House, The Crescent, Salford M5 4QA, UK;
d.baker{at}salford.ac.uk

Study objectives: To examine changing inequality in the coverage of cervical screening and its relation to organisational aspects of primary care and to inequality in cervical cancer incidence and mortality.

Design: Retrospective time trends analysis (1991–2001) of screening coverage and cervical cancer incidence and mortality in England.

Setting: The 99 district health authorities in England, as defined by 1999 boundaries were used to create a time series of incidence and mortality rates from cervical cancer per 100 000 population. A subset of 60 district health authorities were used to construct a time series of screening coverage data and GP and practice characteristics. Health authorities were categorised into one of three "deprivation" groups using the Townsend Deprivation Index.

Participants: Women aged <35 and 35–64 were selected from health authority populations as the main focus of the study.

Results: Cervical cancer screening coverage was consistently higher in affluent areas from 1991–9 but ratio rates of inequality between affluent and deprived health authorities narrowed over time. The increase in coverage in deprived areas was most closely associated with an increase in the number of practice nurses. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates were consistently higher in deprived health authorities, but inequality decreased. Screening coverage and cervical cancer rates were highly negatively correlated in deprived health authorities.

Conclusion: A primary health care intervention such as an organised programme of cervical screening can contribute to reducing inequality in population health.

Keywords: cervical screening uptake; health inequality; cervical cancer; preventive medicine

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

OF GREEK GODDESSES AND MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH

John R Ashton and Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
J Epidemiol Community Health 2003 57: 393. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Marlow, L. A V, Waller, J., Wardle, J. (2008). Sociodemographic predictors of HPV testing and vaccination acceptability: results from a population-representative sample of British women. J Med Screen 15: 91-96 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Campbell, S., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Middleton, E., Sibbald, B., Roland, M. (2007). Quality of Primary Care in England with the Introduction of Pay for Performance. NEJM 357: 181-190 [Full Text]  
• Tacken, M. A. J. B., Braspenning, J. C. C., Hermens, R. P. M. G., Spreeuwenberg, P. M. M., van den Hoogen, H. J. M., de Bakker, D. H., Groenewegen, P. P., Grol, R. P. T. M. (2007). Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization. Eur J Public Health 17: 178-185 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Willoughby, B. J., Faulkner, K., Stamp, E. C., Whitaker, C. J. (2006). A descriptive study of the decline in cervical screening coverage rates in the North East and Yorkshire and the Humber Regions of the UK from 1995 to 2005. J Public Health (Oxf) 28: 355-360 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McLean, G, Sutton, M, Guthrie, B (2006). Deprivation and quality of primary care services: evidence for persistence of the inverse care law from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60: 917-922 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Doran, T., Fullwood, C., Gravelle, H., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Hiroeh, U., Roland, M. (2006). Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.. NEJM 355: 375-384 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wilson, T., Roland, M., Ham, C. (2006). The contribution of general practice and the general practitioner to NHS patients. JRSM 99: 24-28 [Full Text]  
• Roland, M. (2004). Linking Physicians' Pay to the Quality of Care -- A Major Experiment in the United Kingdom. NEJM 351: 1448-1454 [Full Text]