Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2003;57:368-372; doi:10.1136/jech.57.5.368
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2003;57:368-372
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group

RESEARCH REPORT

Long term outcome after poliomyelitis in different health and social conditions

T Rekand1, J Kõrv2, E Farbu1, M Roose2, N E Gilhus1, N Langeland3 and J A Aarli1

1 Department of Neurology, Haukeland Hospital, Bergen, Norway
2 Department of Neurology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
3 Department of Medicine, Haukeland Hospital, Bergen, Norway

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr T Rekand, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway;
Tiina.Rekand{at}helse-bergen.no

Objective: To examine and compare the long term outcome after polio in an east European and a west European country with different access to rehabilitation and with different medical and social conditions.

Design and Setting: The patients who were acutely hospitalised for polio 1950–54 in the University Hospital in Bergen, Norway and 1958 in the University Hospital in Tartu, Estonia received the mailed questionnaire in the period between January 1998 and December 1998.

Patients: Patient files concerning 334 patients hospitalised in Tartu and 243 patients hospitalised in Bergen were obtained; of these 128 Estonian and 148 Norwegian patients were re-examined.

Main results: Despite more pronounced disability in the acute stage, significantly more Norwegian patients were working full time and part time in 1998 (p<0.0001) and also through the period 1958–1998. In both countries, 30% of patients had manual work and 18% changed profession during their career. Low income (below 50% of national average) was reported by 73% of Estonian and 35% of Norwegian patients (p<0.0001). Except for the odds ratio for muscular pain of 1.89 (95%CI =1.14 to 3.14) for Norwegian patients, new symptoms indicating late progression did not differ. Norwegian patients were more independent with significantly less need for assistance in housekeeping (p=0.02), whereas the use of orthopaedic devices did not differ.

Conclusions: The long term outcome after polio is different in eastern and western Europe. Access to continuous rehabilitation seems to maintain physical independence in polio patients, improves their ability to earn their own income, and lessens the need for disability pensions.

Keywords: polio; rehabilitation; employment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

"ALE/HALE/DALE OR IMR"
John R Ashton and Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
J Epidemiol Community Health 2003 57: 313. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs