HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Web-only Appendices Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Galobardes, B Articles by Morabia, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Galobardes, B Articles by Morabia, A Topic Collections Relevant Article

Measuring the habitat as an indicator of socioeconomic position: methodology and its association with hypertension

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr B Galobardes, Department of Social Medicine, Bristol University, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK;
bruna.galobardes{at}bristol.ac.uk

Study objectives: (1) to develop an indicator of socioeconomic position based on the social standing of the habitat (SSH), that is, the residential building, its immediate surroundings, and local neighbourhood; (2) to assess the relation of SSH to two usual markers of socioeconomic position (education and occupation) and a known, socially determined health outcome (hypertension).

Design: Population survey measuring SSH, detailed educational and occupational histories, and blood pressure. The SSH is a standardised assessment of the external and internal aspects of someone’s building (or house), and of the characteristics of its immediate surroundings and local neighbourhood.

Setting: A sample of participants to the Bus Santé survey between 1993 and 1998, in Geneva, Switzerland.

Participants: 588 men and women, aged 35 to 74.

Main results: The SSH index was highly reproducible (=0.8). Concordance of SSH with education or occupation was good for people of either high or low socioeconomic position, but not for those with medium education and/or occupation. There was a higher prevalence of hypertension in the lowest compared with the highest groups, defined on the basis of education or occupation, but the SSH was the only indicator that showed a higher prevalence of hypertension among people in the middle of the social spectrum.

Conclusions: People of medium education or occupation are heterogeneous with respect to their habitat. Those living in habitats of medium social standing may be most affected by hypertension but this association could not be revealed on the basis of education and occupation alone. The habitat seems to capture different aspects of the socioeconomic position compared with the usual indicators of social class.

Keywords: social standing of the habitat; socioeconomic position; hypertension

Relevant Article

SOME BY FIRE AND SOME BY THEIR OWN HAND

John R Ashton and Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2003 57: 233. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Sabanayagam, A. Shankar, S. M. Saw, S. C. Lim, E S. Tai, and T. Y. Wong Socioeconomic status and microalbuminuria in an Asian population Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 11, 2008; (2008) gfn447v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Galobardes, J. Lynch, and G. Davey Smith Measuring socioeconomic position in health research Br. Med. Bull., February 6, 2007; (2007) ldm001v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Galobardes, M. Shaw, D. A Lawlor, J. W Lynch, and G. Davey Smith Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1) J. Epidemiol. Community Health, January 1, 2006; 60(1): 7 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Zyada Visualizing sense of community and social fragmentation Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2005; 34(6): 1255 - 1256. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Shaw, H. Tunstall, and G. Davey Smith Seeing social position: visualizing class in life and death Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2003; 32(3): 332 - 335. [Full Text] [PDF]