Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2003;57:63-67; doi:10.1136/jech.57.1.63
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2003;57:63-67
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group

THEORY AND METHODS

Low response rate schools in surveys of adolescent risk taking behaviours: possible biases, possible solutions

B C Weitzman1, S Guttmacher2, S Weinberg2 and F Kapadia3

1 New York University Robert F Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, USA
2 New York University School of Education, USA
3 Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies, New York Academy of Medicine, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr B C Weitzman, NYU Wagner Graduate School, Tisch Hall–Room 600, 40 West 4th Street, New York, NY 10012, USA;
beth.weitzman{at}nyu.edu

Study objective: To examine the potential biases introduced when students in low response rate schools are dropped from classroom based surveys of adolescent risk taking behaviour.

Design: Self administered confidential surveys were conducted in classrooms, with follow up visits to each school to survey students absent during the initial survey administration. Data on students in schools that achieved a 70% response rate are compared with data on students in schools that did not achieve this level of response.

Setting: New York City, United States.

Participants: 1854 10th graders in 13 public (state supported) high schools.

Main results: Students in schools with low response rates resulting from high rates of absenteeism have different demographic characteristics and engage in more risk behaviours than students in schools with low absenteeism and high response rates. Excluding schools with low rates of response can have an effect on estimates of risk behaviour, even after data are weighted for individual absences. The potential for bias is greatest when, in sampling schools, the proportion of schools with low response rates is large, and when such schools represent a large share of the students in the area under study.

Conclusions: Excluding schools with poor response rates from survey samples using a classroom based approach does not improve, and may, under some circumstances, underestimate risky behaviour among adolescent populations.

Keywords: adolescence; risk behaviour; sampling


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs