Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2002;56:529-535; doi:10.1136/jech.56.7.529
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2002;56:529-535
© 2002 Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

HAVANA PAPER

Genetics and social class

N A Holtzman

Institute of Genetic Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr N A Holtzman, Genetics and Public Policy Studies, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 550 North Broadway, Suite 511, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 21205–2004;
holtzman{at}jhmi.edu

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess claims that genes are a major determinant of social class.

Design: Using genetic epidemiological principles, five claims on the role of genes in determining social class are examined: (1) traits that run in families are usually inherited; (2) complex traits can be explained by alleles at a single gene locus; (3) complex traits are transmitted intact from one generation to the next; (4) natural selection explains social advantage. (5) Heritability estimates provide a valid estimate of the importance of genes in explaining complex human traits or behaviour.

Results: (1) Traits that run in families can result from environmental exposures that differ by social class. (2) The protein encoded by any single gene has too narrow a range of biological activity to explain traits as complex as social status. (3) Because alleles at different gene loci are transmitted independently, genetic inheritance cannot explain why offspring display the same complex traits as their parents. (4) The propagation of mutations that might result in a selective advantage takes much longer than the time for which any social class has achieved or maintained dominance. (5) Heritability measures are accurate only when environment is maintained constant. This is impossible in evaluating human traits.

Conclusions: The roots of social class differences do not lie in our genes. Consequently, genetics cannot be used as a justification for maintaining a ruling class, limiting procreation among the poor, or minimising social support programmes.

Keywords: genetics; social class; heredity; environment; equality


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mackenbach, J. P (2005). Genetics and health inequalities: hypotheses and controversies. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 268-273 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Krieger, N., Davey Smith, G. (2004). "Bodies Count," and Body Counts: Social Epidemiology and Embodying Inequality. Epidemiol Rev 26: 92-103 [Full Text]  
  • Ferrer, R L, Palmer, R (2004). Variations in health status within and between socioeconomic strata. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 381-387 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Starfield, B (2002). Equity in health. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 56: 483-484 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs