© 2002 Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
RESEARCH REPORT
On the World Health Organisation's measurement of health inequalities
Department of Informações em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr C Landmann Szwarcwald, Departmento de Informações em Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Av, Brasil, 4365, 21045-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;
celials{at}fiocruz.br
Study objective: To review the World Health Organisation's methodological approach for the purpose of measuring health inequalities presented in the WHR 2000 and reference papers.
Main findings: Recommending that health inequalities be assessed by measuring interindividual differences, without regard for the distribution of health status among specific population subgroups, the approach taken by WHO does not take into account the socioeconomic dimension, is strongly influenced by the extent of socioeconomic inequalities in the population, and suffers from the health redistribution problem. Apart from the conceptual issues, the estimation procedure also has methodological problems hidden in a sophisticated statistical procedure, which is confusingly explained in one of the referred discussion papers. The results presented in the WHR 2000 are based on Demographic and Health Survey data that refer to more than 10 years ago.
Other methodological problems: The WHO's individual differences measure of health inequalities is expressed in units of survival time raised to the power of 2.5. Besides the difficulty of interpretation, the individual differences index is not a relative measure. However, the index of equality of child survival was defined as the complement of the individual differences index, as though it were a relative measure.
Neglect to the specialised literature: The WHO's index is a particular case in a family of measures that provides generalisations of the Gini coefficient. However, concerns on the adequacy and validity of this procedure for the purposes of measuring health inequalities were completely ignored.
Conclusions: The need to open up the debate with the scientific community has been recently recognised by the executive board of the WHO. In view of the new prospect, the paper concludes by raising some points that can contribute to the discussion on the measurement of health inequalities, with regard to the evaluation of the health system performance.
Keywords: health inequality; socioeconomic distribution; health system performance; WHO
Abbreviations: SES, socioeconomic status; ECS, equality of child survival; IID, interindividual differences; DALE; disability adjusted life expectancy
Relevant Articles
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
J Epidemiol Community Health 2002 56: 161.
J Epidemiol Community Health 2002 56: 6-7.
J Epidemiol Community Health 2002 56: 8-17.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Starfield, B.
(2006). State of the Art in Research on Equity in Health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
31: 11-32
[Abstract]
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Submit a response
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when eLetters are posted
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- Citation Map
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
