PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

A framework for the evidence base to support Health Impact Assessment

M Joffe, J Mindell

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College School of Medicine, London

Correspondence to:
Correspondence:
Dr M Joffe, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College School of Medicine, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK;
m.joffe{at}ic.ac.uk

Objective: To introduce a conceptual structure that can be used to organise the evidence base for Health Impact Assessment (HIA).

Background: HIA can be used to judge the potential health effects of a policy, programme or project on a population, and the distribution of those effects. Progress has been made in incorporating HIA into routine practice, especially (in the UK) at local level. However, these advances have mainly been restricted to process issues, including policy engagement and community involvement, while the evidence base has been relatively neglected.

Relating policies to their impact on health: The key distinctive feature of HIA is that determinants of health are not taken as given, but rather as factors that themselves have determinants. Nine ways are distinguished in which evidence on health and its determinants can be related to policy, and examples are given from the literature. The most complete of these is an analysis of health effects in the context of a comparison of options. A simple model, the policy/risk assessment model (PRAM), is introduced as a framework that relates changes in levels of exposures or other risk factors to changes in health status. This approach allows a distinction to be made between the technical process of HIA and the political process of decision making, which involves lines of accountability. Extension of the PRAM model to complex policy areas and its adaptation to non-quantitative examples are discussed.

Issues for the future: A sound evidence base is essential to the long term reputation of HIA. Research gaps are discussed, especially the need for evidence connecting policy options with changes in determinants of health. It is proposed that policy options could be considered as "exposure" variables in research. The methodology needs to be developed in the course of work on specific issues, concentrated in policy areas that are relatively tractable.

Conclusions: A system of coordination needs to be established, at national or supranational level, building on existing initiatives. The framework suggested in this paper can be used to collate and evaluate what is already known, both to identify gaps where research is required and to enable an informed judgement to be made about the potential health impacts of policy options. These judgements should be made widely available for policy makers and for those undertaking health impact assessment.

Keywords: health impact assessment; evidence base

Abbreviations: HIA; Health Impact Assessment

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Schram-Bijkerk, D, van Kempen, E, Knol, A B, Kruize, H, Staatsen, B, van Kamp, I (2009). Quantitative health impact assessment of transport policies: two simulations related to speed limit reduction and traffic re-allocation in the Netherlands. Occup. Environ. Med. 66: 691-698 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Joffe, M., Mindell, J. (2006). Complex Causal Process Diagrams for Analyzing the Health Impacts of Policy Interventions. AJPH 96: 473-479 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mindell, J., Barrowcliffe, R. (2005). Linking environmental effects to health impacts: a computer modelling approach for air pollution. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 1092-1098 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Joffe, M, Mindell, J (2005). HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Occup. Environ. Med. 62: 907-912 [Full Text]  
• Mindell, J., Joffe, M. (2005). Mathematical modelling of health impacts. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 617-618 [Full Text]  
• Cole, B. L, Shimkhada, R., Morgenstern, H., Kominski, G., Fielding, J. E, Wu, S. (2005). Projected health impact of the Los Angeles City living wage ordinance. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 645-650 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Veerman, J L, Barendregt, J J, Mackenbach, J P (2005). Quantitative health impact assessment: current practice and future directions. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 361-370 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mindell, J, Joffe, M (2004). Predicted health impacts of urban air quality management. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 103-113 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Elliott, M R, Wang, Y, Lowe, R A, Kleindorfer, P R (2004). Environmental justice: frequency and severity of US chemical industry accidents and the socioeconomic status of surrounding communities. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 24-30 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bull, S. S., Gillette, C., Glasgow, R. E., Estabrooks, P. (2003). Work Site Health Promotion Research: To what Extent can we Generalize the Results and what is Needed to Translate Research to Practice?. Health Educ Behav 30: 537-549 [Abstract]  
• Mindell, J, Ison, E, Joffe, M (2003). A glossary for health impact assessment. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 647-651 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Frumkin, H. (2003). Healthy Places: Exploring the Evidence. AJPH 93: 1451-1456 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Joffe, M., Mindell, J., Feldman, S. (2003). Congestion charging. BMJ 326: 884-884 [Full Text]