© 2002 Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
RESEARCH REPORT
Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease
1 Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor R A Raine, Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK;
rosalind.raine{at}lshtm.ac.uk
Study objectives: To compare the clinical management and health outcomes of men and women after admission with acute coronary syndromes, after adjusting for disease severity, sociodemographic, and cardiac risk factors.
Design: Prospective national survey of acute cardiac admissions followed up by mailed patient questionnaire two to three years after initial admission.
Setting: Random sample of 94 district general hospitals in the UK.
Patients: 1064 patients under 70 years old recruited between April 1995 and November 1996.
Main results: Of the 1064 patients recruited, 126 (11.8%) died before follow up. Of the 938 survivors, 719 (76.7%) completed a follow up questionnaire. There were no gender differences in the use of cardiac investigations during the index admission or follow up period. However, male patients with hypertension were more likely to undergo rehabilitation compared with female hypertensive patients (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 4.72). Men were also more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) than women (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.21 to 3.00), but there was no gender difference in the use of revascularisation overall (p=0.14). An indirect indication that the gender differences in CABG were not attributable to bias was provided by the lack of gender differences in health outcomes, which implies that patients received the care they needed.
Conclusions: Despite the extensive international literature referring to a gender bias in favour of men with coronary heart disease, this national survey found no gender differences in the use of investigations or in revascularisation overall. However, the criteria used for selecting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with CABG requires further investigation as does the use of rehabilitation. It is unclear whether the clinical decisions to provide these procedures are made solely on the basis of clinical need.
Keywords: gender; coronary heart disease; treatment; health status
Abbreviations: CABG; coronary artery bypass grafting; PCTA, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
Relevant Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
J Epidemiol Community Health 2002 56: 721.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Nante, N, Messina, G, Cecchini, M, Bertetto, O, Moirano, F, McKee, M
(2009). Sex differences in use of interventional cardiology persist after risk adjustment. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
63: 203-208
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Alfredsson, J., Stenestrand, U., Wallentin, L., Swahn, E.
(2007). Gender differences in management and outcome in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart
93: 1357-1362
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Aalto, A.-M., Weinman, J., French, D. P., Aro, A. R., Manderbacka, K., Keskimaki, I.
(2007). Sociodemographic Differences in Myocardial Infarction Risk Perceptions among People with Coronary Heart Disease. J Health Psychol
12: 316-329
[Abstract] -
Skumlien, S, Haave, E, Morland, L, Bjortuft, O, Ryg, M S
(2006). Gender differences in the performance of activities of daily living among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic Respiratory Disease
3: 141-148
[Abstract]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
