Theory and methods
Methods used to maintain a high level of participant involvement
in a clinical trial
M E Hellard, M I Sinclair, A B Forbes, C K Fairley
Department of
Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Cooperative Research Centre for
Water Quality and Treatment, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Correspondence to: Dr Hellard, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash Medical School, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Prahran, 3181, Australia (margaret.hellard{at}med.monash.edu.au)
Accepted for publication 18 January 2001
OBJECTIVES
To describe
the strategies adopted to maintain high level participation throughout
a community based clinical trial, and the reasons given by participants
for why they participated in the study.
DESIGN
Observational study.
SETTING
Community
based clinical trial in Melbourne, Australia that ran for 68 weeks and
involved 2811 community based individuals from 600 families. A high
level of commitment was required of the families; each participant
completed a Health Diary each week of the 68 week study, as well as
answering numerous other questionnaires, and providing faecal and blood samples.
MAIN RESULTS
Only 41 of the 600 families withdrew from the study; the majority of these
families withdrew because they sold their home and moved from the study
area. The completion rate of Health Diaries averaged 90.7% over the 68 weeks of data collection. Of the 559 families who completed the study,
524 (93.7%) completed the Participation Questionnaire. The statement
that received the highest rating for why families enrolled in the study
was they thought the study was researching an important community
issue. The statements that received the highest ratings for why
families continued to participate in the study was the family being
kept well informed about the study's progress and that the study was
well run.
CONCLUSIONS
The low
numbers of withdrawals and the high level of participation throughout
the study suggests the strategies of (a) having a non-aggressive
recruitment method, (b) maintaining regular contact with the
participants and (c) ensuring participants were kept well informed of
the study's progress and constantly encouraged to continue
participation were successful. The results also suggest people involve
themselves in research because they perceive it to be of value to the
community, not simply for personal gain. They indicated that they
maintained their participation because it was a well run study and they
were kept well informed throughout the study.
Keywords: recruitment; participation; clinical trial
© 2001 by Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Stull, V. B., Snyder, D. C., Demark-Wahnefried, W.
(2007). Lifestyle Interventions in Cancer Survivors: Designing Programs That Meet the Needs of This Vulnerable and Growing Population. J. Nutr.
137: 243S-248S
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Tercyak, K. P., Donze, J. R., Prahlad, S., Mosher, R. B., Shad, A. T.
(2006). Identifying, Recruiting, and Enrolling Adolescent Survivors of Childhood Cancer into a Randomized Controlled Trial of Health Promotion: Preliminary Experiences in the Survivor Health and Resilience Education (SHARE) Program. J Pediatr Psychol
31: 252-261
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
