Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2001;55:277-282; doi:10.1136/jech.55.4.277
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:277-282 ( April )

Public health policy and practice

Evaluation of "Live for Life", a health promotion programme in the County of Skaraborg, Sweden H Lingforsa, K Lindströma, L-G Perssona, C Bengtssonb, L Lissnerb

a Health Centre of Habo, Habo, Sweden, b Department of Primary Health Care, Göteborg University, Vasa Hospital, SE-411 33 Gothenburg, Sweden

Correspondence to: Professor Bengtsson (calle.bengtsson{at}allmed.gu.se)

Accepted for publication 13 November 2000

STUDY OBJECTIVE---To evaluate a health promotion programme, combining a population and individual based strategy, in the County of Skaraborg, Sweden, with special attention to outcome.
DESIGN---The evaluation was subdivided into structure, process and outcome. The evaluation procedure as a total is described here, but the results presented refer only to outcome. In order to study the potential effect of the individually based health examination, 35 year old subjects who had participated five years previously were in 1994-1996 compared with 35 year old subjects who had not participated before, and compared with their own values five years earlier. The results during 1995-1996 were compared with those of 1989-1990 for corresponding ages in order to study the effect of, particularly, the population based strategy.
SETTING---The County of Skaraborg in the south western part of Sweden with about 270 000 inhabitants. In addition to population strategy, involving the total county, men and women aged 30 and 35 years were invited to an individually based examination.
MAIN RESULTS---Factors related to body weight increased during the study period, while other factors mostly changed in the direction wanted. As a whole the changes were rather modest. There were favourable changes in lifestyle variables, for example, concerning smoking and dietary habits.
CONCLUSIONS---There were beneficial effects from the health promotion programme, but there is a need for continuous improvement of methods of intervention referred to lifestyle.


Keywords: evaluation; screening; prevention; primary health care; ischaemic heart disease


© 2001 by Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Piko, B. F. (2004). Interplay between Self and Community: A Role for Health Psychology in Eastern Europe's Public Health. J Health Psychol 9: 111-120 [Abstract]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs