Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2001;55:191-197; doi:10.1136/jech.55.3.191
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:191-197 ( March )

Theory and methods

Partitioned prostate cancer prevalence estimates: an informative measure of the disease burden R M Merrill

Department of Health Science, College of Health and Human Performance, Brigham Young University, Provo and Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah College of Medicine, USA

Correspondence to: Dr Merrill, Department of Health Science, College of Health and Human Performance, Brigham Young University, 213 Richards Building, Provo, Utah, 84602, USA (Ray_Merrill{at}byu.edu)

Accepted for publication 14 September 2000

STUDY OBJECTIVES---Public health burden of disease is often measured using prevalence statistics. Prevalence of invasive prostate cancer in the United States is presented according to age at diagnosis, time from diagnosis, geographical area, and two races (white and black).
DESIGN---Invasive prostate cancer data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute is used for obtaining prevalence estimates.
MAIN RESULTS---Despite falling prostate cancer incidence rates, the prevalence of this disease continues to rise for both white and black men. Black men diagnosed at ages 60 years and older experience lower levels of prevalence of prostate cancer than white men because of poorer survival and a smaller proportion of black men living to older ages where the disease becomes common. Black men require fewer years of follow up than white men to capture over 99% of prevalent cases (that is, 14 years versus 16 years, respectively). Prevalence estimates in the United States are traditionally based on Connecticut data. On 1 January 1997, United States prostate cancer prevalence estimates based on Connecticut are overestimated for white men and underestimated for black men.
CONCLUSIONS---Partitioned prevalence estimates may provide a more meaningful and informative measure of the disease burden than conventional prevalence estimates. Prostate cancer prevalence estimates based on SEER rather than Connecticut data are better representative of the United States.


Keywords: chronic conditions; life expectancy; health care; survival


© 2001 by Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Merrill, R. M., Morris, M. K. (2002). Prevalence-corrected Prostate Cancer Incidence Rates and Trends. Am J Epidemiol 155: 148-152 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs