Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2001;55:905-912; doi:10.1136/jech.55.12.905
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:905-912 ( December )

Theory and methods

Causation in epidemiology M Parascandola, D L Weed

Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Office of Preventive Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza South, Suite T-41, 6120 Executive Blvd, MSC 7105, Bethesda, MD 20892-7105, USA

Correspondence to: Dr Parascandola (paramark{at}mail.nih.gov)

Accepted for publication 22 May 2001

Causation is an essential concept in epidemiology, yet there is no single, clearly articulated definition for the discipline. From a systematic review of the literature, five categories can be delineated: production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic. Strengths and weaknesses of these categories are examined in terms of proposed characteristics of a useful scientific definition of causation: it must be specific enough to distinguish causation from mere correlation, but not so narrow as to eliminate apparent causal phenomena from consideration. Two categories---production and counterfactual---are present in any definition of causation but are not themselves sufficient as definitions. The necessary and sufficient cause definition assumes that all causes are deterministic. The sufficient-component cause definition attempts to explain probabilistic phenomena via unknown component causes. Thus, on both of these views, heavy smoking can be cited as a cause of lung cancer only when the existence of unknown deterministic variables is assumed. The probabilistic definition, however, avoids these assumptions and appears to best fit the characteristics of a useful definition of causation. It is also concluded that the probabilistic definition is consistent with scientific and public health goals of epidemiology. In debates in the literature over these goals, proponents of epidemiology as pure science tend to favour a narrower deterministic notion of causation models while proponents of epidemiology as public health tend to favour a probabilistic view. The authors argue that a single definition of causation for the discipline should be and is consistent with both of these aims. It is concluded that a counterfactually-based probabilistic definition is more amenable to the quantitative tools of epidemiology, is consistent with both deterministic and probabilistic phenomena, and serves equally well for the acquisition and the application of scientific knowledge.


Keywords: causality; counterfactual; philosophy


© 2001 by Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Aranaz-Andres, J M, Aibar-Remon, C, Vitaller-Murillo, J, Ruiz-Lopez, P, Limon-Ramirez, R, Terol-Garcia, E, the ENEAS work group, (2008). Incidence of adverse events related to health care in Spain: results of the Spanish National Study of Adverse Events. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: 1022-1029 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Macleod, J. (2007). Cannabis use and psychosis: the origins and implications of an association. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 13: 400-411 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shields, P. G. (2006). Understanding population and individual risk assessment: the case of polychlorinated biphenyls.. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15: 830-839 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hoffmann, K., Heidemann, C., Weikert, C., Schulze, M. B., Boeing, H. (2006). Estimating the Proportion of Disease due to Classes of Sufficient Causes. Am J Epidemiol 163: 76-83 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Thygesen, L. C., Andersen, G. S., Andersen, H. (2005). A philosophical analysis of the Hill criteria. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 512-516 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rychetnik, L., Hawe, P., Waters, E., Barratt, A., Frommer, M. (2004). A glossary for evidence based public health. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 538-545 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Macleod, J, Davey Smith, G (2003). Psychosocial factors and public health: a suitable case for treatment?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 565-570 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tam, C C, Lopman, B A (2003). Determinism versus stochasticism: in support of long coffee breaks. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 477-478 [Full Text]  
  • Olsen, J (2003). What characterises a useful concept of causation in epidemiology?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 86-88 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs