Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2000;54:590-595; doi:10.1136/jech.54.8.590
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:590-595 ( August )

Research report

Mortality after acute myocardial infarction is lower in metropolitan regions than in non-metropolitan regions Huy Dinh Vu, Richard F Heller, Lynette L-Y Lim, Catherine D'Este, Rachel L O'Connell

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Newcastle, David Maddison Clinical Sciences Building, Royal Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle NSW 2300, Australia

Correspondence to: Professor Heller (rfhcceb{at}ibm.net)

Accepted for publication 1 February 2000

STUDY OBJECTIVES---To compare inhospital mortality for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between metropolitan and non-metropolitan hospitals after adjustment for patients' severity; to examine the role of the use of effective cardiac medications in the possible mortality difference between these types of hospital.
DESIGN---Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING---47 acute public hospitals in metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas of New South Wales, Australia, taking part in the Acute Cardiac Care Project based on medical record review.
PATIENTS---1665 patients with principal discharge diagnosis of AMI from February to June 1996.
MAIN RESULTS---There was no difference in crude mortality rate (assessed as seven day mortality) between metropolitan and non-metropolitan hospitals (11.0% compared with 10.7% respectively, p=0.893). After adjustment for severity in a logistic regression model, the odds of death in non-metropolitan hospitals was significantly higher than in metropolitan hospitals (odds ratio = 1.90; 95% CI 1.21, 3.23). The addition of the use of effective cardiac medications to the model resulted in the difference between hospital type becoming non-significant (odds ratio=1.09; 95% CI 0.57, 2.07).
CONCLUSIONS---Inhospital mortality in non-metropolitan hospitals was higher than that in metropolitan hospitals, after adjustment for patients' severity. This might partly be explained by the difference in use of effective cardiac medications between hospital type.


Keywords: inhospital mortality; myocardial infarction; regional differences


© 2000 by Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Messner, T., Lundberg, V., Stegmayr, B. (2003). Cardiovascular risk factor levels differ between communities of different sizes in the Northern Sweden MONICA Project. Scand J Public Health 31: 359-366 [Abstract]  
  • MACINTYRE, C. R., RUTH, D., ANSARI, Z. (2002). Hospital in the home is cost saving for appropriately selected patients: a comparison with in-hospital care. Int J Qual Health Care 14: 285-293 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs