Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol 53, 355-358

Inequalities in low birth weight: parental social class, area deprivation, and "lone mother" status

S Pattenden, H Dolk and M Vrijheid
Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the extent of socioeconomic inequalities in low birth weight. To assess the relative benefits of measuring socioeconomic status by individual occupation, socioeconomic deprivation status of area of residence, or both, for describing inequalities and targeting resources. DESIGN: Analysis of birth registrations by registration status: joint compared with sole registrants ("lone mothers"), routinely recorded parental occupation (father's for joint registrants), and census derived enumeration district (ED) deprivation. SETTING: England and Wales, 1986-92. SUBJECTS: 471,411 births with coded parental occupation (random 10% sample) and birth weight. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of low birth weight (< 2500 g) RESULTS: 34% of births to joint registrants in social classes IV and V, and 45% of births to sole registrants, were in the quintile of most deprived EDs. It was found that 6.8% of births were of low birth weight. Sole registrants were at higher risk (9.3% overall) than joint registrants, across all deprivation quintiles. For joint registrants, the socioeconomic risk gradient was similar by social class or area deprivation, but a greater gradient from 4.7% to 8.7% was found with combined classification. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 30% of low birth weight can be seen as being associated with levels of socioeconomic deprivation below that of the most affluent group, as measured in this study. Caution is needed when targeting interventions to high risk groups when using single indicators. For example, the majority of births to lone mothers and to joint registrants in social classes IV and V would be missed by targeting the most deprived quintile. There is a high degree of inequality in low birth weight according to social class, area deprivation and lone mother status. When using routinely recorded birth and census data, all three factors are important to show the true extent of inequalities.

Copyright © 1999 by the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Quinn, G. P., August, E. M., Austin, D., Keefe, C., Bernadotte, C., Scarborough, K., Jeffers, D. (2009). High Risk Community--Men's Perceptions of Black Infant Mortality: A Qualitative Inquiry. Am J Mens Health 3: 224-237 [Abstract]  
• Liu, Y., Liu, J., Ye, R., Ren, A., Li, S., Li, Z. (2008). Association of Education and the Occurrence of Low Birthweight in Rural Southern China During the Early and Late 1990s. AJPH 98: 687-691 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Smith, L K, Draper, E S, Manktelow, B N, Dorling, J S, Field, D J (2007). Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth rates. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 92: F11-F14 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Dibben, C., Sigala, M., Macfarlane, A. (2006). Area deprivation, individual factors and low birth weight in England: is there evidence of an "area effect"?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60: 1053-1059 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Delpisheh, A., Kelly, Y., Rizwan, S., Brabin, B. J. (2006). Socio-economic status, smoking during pregnancy and birth outcomes: an analysis of cross-sectional community studies in Liverpool (1993-2001). J Child Health Care 10: 140-148 [Abstract]  
• Petrou, S., Kupek, E. (2005). Socioeconomic differences in childhood hospital inpatient service utilisation and costs: prospective cohort study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 591-597 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sundrum, R, Logan, S, Wallace, A, Spencer, N (2005). Cerebral palsy and socioeconomic status: a retrospective cohort study. Arch. Dis. Child. 90: 15-18 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Astolfi, P., De Pasquale, A., Zonta, L.A. (2004). Late paternity and stillbirth risk. Hum Reprod 19: 2497-2501 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Renfrew, M J, Ansell, P, Macleod, K L (2003). Formula feed preparation: helping reduce the risks; a systematic review. Arch. Dis. Child. 88: 855-858 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Moser, K, Li, L, Power, C (2003). Social inequalities in low birth weight in England and Wales: trends and implications for future population health. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 687-691 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Krieger, N, Chen, J T, Waterman, P D, Soobader, M-J, Subramanian, S V, Carson, R (2003). Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US). J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 186-199 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Langnase, K., Mast, M., Danielzik, S., Spethmann, C., Muller, M. J. (2003). Socioeconomic Gradients in Body Weight of German Children Reverse Direction between the Ages of 2 and 6 Years. J. Nutr. 133: 789-796 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Starfield, B, Riley, A W, Witt, W P, Robertson, J (2002). Social class gradients in health during adolescence. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 56: 354-361 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• PATTENDEN, S (2001). Air traffic noise and hypertension in Stockholm County. Occup. Environ. Med. 58: 761-761 [Full Text]  
• Pietilainen, K. H., Kaprio, J., Rasanen, M., Winter, T., Rissanen, A., Rose, R. J. (2001). Tracking of Body Size from Birth to Late Adolescence: Contributions of Birth Length, Birth Weight, Duration of Gestation, Parents' Body Size, and Twinship. Am J Epidemiol 154: 21-29 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Vrijheid, M, Dolk, H, Stone, D, Abramsky, L, Alberman, E, Scott, J E S (2000). Socioeconomic inequalities in risk of congenital anomaly. Arch. Dis. Child. 82: 349-352 [Abstract] [Full Text]