Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol 52, 310-317

Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA

MF MacDorman and GK Singh
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if there are significant differences in birth outcomes and survival for infants delivered by certified nurse midwives compared with those delivered by physicians, and whether these differences, if they exist, remain after controlling for sociodemographic and medical risk factors. DESIGN: Logistic regression models were used to examine differences between certified nurse midwife and physician delivered births in infant, neonatal, and postneonatal mortality, and risk of low birthweight after controlling for a variety of social and medical risk factors. Ordinary least squares regression models were used to examine differences in mean birthweight after controlling for the same risk factors. STUDY SETTING: United States. PATIENTS: The study included all singleton, vaginal births at 35-43 weeks gestation delivered either by physicians or certified nurse midwives in the United States in 1991. MAIN RESULTS: After controlling for social and medical risk factors, the risk of experiencing an infant death was 19% lower for certified nurse midwife attended than for physician attended births, the risk of neonatal mortality was 33% lower, and the risk of delivering a low birthweight infant 31% lower. Mean birthweight was 37 grams heavier for the certified nurse midwife attended than for physician attended births. CONCLUSIONS: National data support the findings of previous local studies that certified nurse midwives have excellent birth outcomes. These findings are discussed in light of differences between certified nurse midwives and physicians in prenatal care and labour and delivery care practices. Certified nurse midwives provide a safe and viable alternative to maternity care in the United States, particularly for low to moderate risk women.

Copyright © 1998 by the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Salvador, J, Cano-Serral, G, Rodriguez-Sanz, M, Lladonosa, A, Borrell, C (2009). Inequalities in caesarean section: influence of the type of maternity care and social class in an area with a national health system. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 63: 259-261 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hastings-Tolsma, M., Tasaka, Y., Burton, A., Goodman, S., Emeis, C. L., Patterson, E., Bennett, P., Koschoreck, K., Ruyak, S., Tanner, T., Vaughn, T., Williams, A. (2009). A Profile of Colorado Nurse--Midwives: Implications for Health Care. West J Nurs Res 31: 24-43 [Abstract]  
• Kennedy, H. P. (2002). The Midwife as an "Instrument" of Care. AJPH 92: 1759-1760 [Full Text]  
• (2002). Policy Statements Adopted by the Governing Council of the American Public Health Association, October 24, 2001. AJPH 92: 451-483 [Full Text]  
• Visintainer, P. F, Uman, J., Horgan, K., Ibald, A., Verma, U., Tejani, N. (2000). Reduced risk of low weight births among indigent women receiving care from nurse-midwives. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 54: 233-238 [Abstract] [Full Text]