Distressed or relieved? Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands.

W Scaf-Klomp, R Sanderman, H B van de Wiel, R Otter and W J van den Heuvel

Northern Centre for Health Care Research, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the psychological impact of mammographic screening on women with non-malignant outcomes after attending the Netherlands' National Breast Cancer Screening Programme. DESIGN: During one year all women with false positive test results (95) in a screening area were invited for the study. Each false positive was matched with two women with normal mammograms with respect to age and municipality. A random reference group of 400 was drawn from the female population in an area not yet included in the screening programme. Experiences with screening and psychological status of subjects were assessed 8-10 weeks after screening (T1) and again after six months (T2), by interviews as well as questionnaires. References completed two questionnaires with a six months' interval. PARTICIPANTS: 74 (78%) women with false positive outcomes and 113 (59%) women with negative outcomes participated at T1, of these 65 (88%) and 105 (93%) at T2, respectively; 238 references returned questionnaires at T1 (59%), of these 143 (60%) at T2. MAIN RESULTS: At 8-10 weeks after the screening, the women who received false positive test results scored higher on most of the variables indicating psychological disfunctioning than women with normal mammograms, but did not notably differ on the same variables from the non-screened reference group. Women with normal mammograms had the lowest scores on all the variables in the study at both assessments. The same situation was observed six months later. Although 61% of the women who received false positive mammograms reported that they had experienced the "false alarm" as a stressful event, this experience had apparently no adverse effects on their psychological functioning, as assessed 8-10 weeks after screening. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, breast screening is not likely to generate adverse psychological effects in "healthy" women, even if the outcome is false positive. Differences in psychological functioning between false positives and negatives are more likely ascribable to feelings of relief in the negative group than to raised anxiety and distress in the false positive group.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Gibson, C.J., Weiss, J., Goodrich, M., Onega, T. (2009). False-positive mammography and depressed mood in a screening population: findings from the New Hampshire Mammography Network. J Public Health (Oxf) 0: fdp064v1-fdp064 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brewer, N. T., Salz, T., Lillie, S. E. (2007). Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive Mammograms. ANN INTERN MED 146: 502-510 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Armstrong, K., Moye, E., Williams, S., Berlin, J. A., Reynolds, E. E. (2007). Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians. ANN INTERN MED 146: 516-526 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wermer, M.J.H., van der Schaaf, I.C., Van Nunen, P., Bossuyt, P.M.M., Anderson, C.S., Rinkel, G.J.E. (2005). Psychosocial Impact of Screening for Intracranial Aneurysms in Relatives With Familial Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Stroke 36: 836-840 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Simon, A. E., Steptoe, A., Wardle, J. (2005). Socioeconomic Status Differences in Coping With a Stressful Medical Procedure. Psychosom. Med. 67: 270-276 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Domar, A. D., Eyvazzadeh, A., Allen, S., Roman, K., Wolf, R., Orav, J., Albright, N., Baum, J. (2005). Relaxation Techniques for Reducing Pain and Anxiety During Screening Mammography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 184: 445-447 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lafata, J. E., Simpkins, J., Lamerato, L., Poisson, L., Divine, G., Johnson, C. C. (2004). The Economic Impact of False-Positive Cancer Screens. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 13: 2126-2132 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Barratt, A., Trevena, L., Davey, H. M, McCaffery, K. (2004). Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening. BMJ 329: 507-510 [Full Text]  
• Col, N. F., Weber, G., Stiggelbout, A., Chuo, J., D'Agostino, R., Corso, P. (2004). Short-term Menopausal Hormone Therapy for Symptom Relief: An Updated Decision Model. Arch Intern Med 164: 1634-1640 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Taylor, K. L., Shelby, R., Gelmann, E., McGuire, C. (2004). Quality of Life and Trial Adherence Among Participants in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 1083-1094 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cullen, J., Schwartz, M. D., Lawrence, W. F., Selby, J. V., Mandelblatt, J. S. (2004). Short-Term Impact of Cancer Prevention and Screening Activities on Quality of Life. JCO 22: 943-952 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gurevich, M., Devins, G. M., Wilson, C., McCready, D., Marmar, C. R., Rodin, G. M. (2004). Stress Response Syndromes in Women Undergoing Mammography: A Comparison of Women With and Without a History of Breast Cancer. Psychosom. Med. 66: 104-112 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Janda, M., Stanton, W. R., Hughes, K., Del Mar, C., Clavarino, A., Aitken, J. F., Tong, S., Short, L., Leggett, B., Newman, B. (2003). Knowledge, Attitude and Intentions Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Faecal Occult Blood Tests in a Rural Australian Population. Asia Pac J Public Health 15: 50-56 [Abstract]  
• van Maarle, M C, Stouthard, M E A, Bonsel, G J (2003). Quality of life in a family based genetic cascade screening programme for familial hypercholesterolaemia: a longitudinal study among participants. J. Med. Genet. 40: e3-3 [Full Text]