J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toan, N. V.
Right arrow Articles by Sundstrom, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toan, N. V.
Right arrow Articles by Sundstrom, K.

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol 50, 451-455


ARTICLES

Utilisation of reproductive health services in rural Vietnam; are there equal opportunities to plan and protect pregnancies?

NV Toan, HT Hoa, PV Trong, B Hojer, LA Persson and K Sundstrom
Department of Environment, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi School of Medicine, Vietnam.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe the utilisation of reproductive health services (family planning, antenatal care, and delivery services) and the socioeconomic determinants for utilisation of health services. DESIGN: This was a cross sectional survey, using a multistage sampling technique. SETTING: Tien Hai district, Thai Binh Province, Vietnam. Altogether 1132 mothers with children under 5 years of age were interviewed about antenatal, delivery, and family planning services utilisation during a five year period (1987-92). MAIN RESULTS: Seventy per cent of the women used contraceptive methods, with the intrauterine device being the most common. The use of the intrauterine device was positively associated with the number of children alive but not with other sociodemographic factors in the mothers. Thirty per cent of the women had attended an antenatal clinic for check ups during their last pregnancy. It was found that mothers with fewer deliveries, higher education, and who were Buddhist or of no religion had utilised antenatal services more frequently than the others. Seventy five per cent of the mothers in this study had been assisted by health professionals at their last delivery. Those mothers with fewer deliveries, higher education, who were Buddhist or had no religion, and had sufficient to eat were more likely to have their births attended by health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of a relatively high education level in the population and services which are generally available, there was an under utilisation of antenatal and delivery care and there was no equal opportunity for different groups of mothers to use these services. Family planning services were, however, frequently used and were used to the same extent by different groups of mothers. Except for abortion, alternatives to the intrauterine device method were rarely available. If pregnancies are to be protected in an efficient way in rural Vietnam, reproductive health care must be strengthened and efforts should be made to reach the women who are not using these services at present.

 

Copyright © 1996 by the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
N.V. Toan, L.N. Trong, B. Hojer, and L.A. Persson
Public health services use in a mountainous area, Vietnam: implications for health policy
Scand J Public Health, April 1, 2002; 30(2): 86 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pac J Public HealthHome page
C. Phoxay, J. Okumura, Y. Nakamura, and S. Wakai
Influence of Women's Knowledge on Maternal Health Care Utilization in Southern Laos
Asia Pac J Public Health, January 1, 2001; 13(1): 13 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1996 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.